- Regulations for Doctoral Studies
- I. General provisions
- II. Doctoral Studies
- II.1. Learners in doctoral studies
- II.2. Supervision
- II.3. Filling a vacant student place
- II.4. Organisation of study
- II.4.1. General principles
- II.4.2. Period of study, suspension of doctoral studies and changes to the period of study of doctoral students matriculated to doctoral programmes opened from the 2022/2023 academic year
- II.4.3. Workload, academic leave and extending the period of study of doctoral students matriculated to doctoral curricula opened before the 2022/2023 academic year
- II.4.4. Individual plan
- II.5. Progress review
- II.5.1. Progress review schedule
- II.5.2. Progress review committee
- II.5.3. Documents required for progress review
- II.5.4. Progress review meeting
- II.5.5. Decisions of the progress review committee
- II.5.5.1. Decisions of the progress review committee regarding learners in doctoral studies in doctoral programmes opened from the 2022/2023 academic year
- II.5.5.2. Decisions of the progress review committee regarding learners in doctoral studies in doctoral curricula opened before the 2022/2023 academic year
- II.5.6. Repeat progress review and appealing a progress review decision
- II.6. Exmatriculation
- III. Applying for Doctoral Degree
- III.1. Completion of the doctoral programme
- III.2. Council awarding doctoral degrees
- III.3. Requirements for doctoral candidate
- III.4. Requirements for doctoral thesis
- III.4.1. General requirements for doctoral thesis
- III.4.2. Doctoral thesis as an integrated collection of research publications
- III.4.3. Doctoral thesis as a monograph
- III.4.4. Requirement for research publications and the introductory chapter
- III.4.5. Requirements for patents, patent applications and applied solutions
- III.4.6. Structure of the doctoral thesis
- III.5. Allowing a doctoral thesis to be defended
- III.6. Publication of the doctoral thesis
- III.7. Defence of the doctoral thesis
- III.8. Applying for doctoral degree and defence of the doctoral thesis under a joint supervision agreement
- III.9. Contesting and overruling the decisions of the council awarding doctoral degrees
- III.10. Preservation of the doctoral thesis
- IV. Implementing provisions
- Study Regulations
Regulations for Doctoral Studies and Study Regulations
III.5.2. Council’s decisions
124. Within three working days of receiving the documents specified in clause 122, the council chair forwards them to the academic secretary, who assesses the compliance of the submitted materials with the requirements of these regulations, involving experts, if necessary. The academic secretary submits his or her written opinion to the council within eight working days.
125. Within six weeks of receiving the documents submitted by the doctoral candidate, the council makes one of the following decisions:
125.1. to allow the doctoral thesis to be defended;
125.2. to submit the doctoral thesis for a peer-review;
125.3. in the case of deficiencies, to demand the reformulation and correction of the doctoral thesis, making a new decision after that;
125.4. not to allow the doctoral thesis to be defended.
126. Once the peer-reviews have been received, the council makes one of the following decisions:
126.1. to allow the doctoral thesis to be defended;
126.2. in the case of deficiencies, to demand the reformulation and correction of the doctoral thesis, making a new decision after that;
126.3. not to allow the doctoral thesis to be defended.
127. By a decision to allow a doctoral thesis to be defended, the council confirms that the doctoral thesis complies with the requirements provided for in subchapter III.4 and that the doctoral candidate deserves a doctoral degree in the event of a successful defence.
128. The decision specified in clauses 125.3, 125.4, 126.2 and 126.3 must state the reasons.
129. If the council decides to allow a doctoral thesis to be defended, it also appoints the opponent(s) of the thesis, the time and place of defence and, if necessary, additional members of the council.
130. In addition to the standard formal elements, the minutes of the meeting on allowing a doctoral thesis to be defended must also contain the names of the members of the council with decision-making powers as well as their research degrees, the voting results, the name of the doctoral candidate, the title of the doctoral thesis in Estonian and the language of the thesis or, if the doctoral thesis has been written in Estonian, the Estonian and English titles of the doctoral thesis, the names of the supervisor(s), opponent(s) and additional council members (if any) along with their research degrees and institutions, the time and place of defence and the exact name of the degree applied for.
