Gender: Hierarchies and their impact in today's world

Materials

I week

  • Arndt, P. and Wrohlich, K., 2019. Gender quotas in a European comparison: Tough sanctions most effective. DIW Weekly Report, 9(38), pp.337-344.
  • Arnot, M., 2007. Education feminism, gender equality and school reform in late twentieth century England. In International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (pp. 538-557). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Daskalova, K., 2011. The Birth of a Field: Women’s and Gender Studies in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe, Part II. Aspasia, 5, p.128.
  • Falkus, M., 1990. New directions in economic and social history.
  • Hellsten, S., Holli, A. and Daskalova, K. eds., 2005. Women’s citizenship and political rights.
  • Springer.
  • Lie S. 2000  Mis on naisuurimus?  Ariadne Lõng. Nais- ja meesuurimuse ajakiri. Teabekeskus (ENUT). Tallinna Pedagoogika Ülikool. I aastakaik 1 /2, 2000
  • Parker, P., 2015. The historical role of women in higher education. Administrative Issues Journal, 5(1), p.3
  • Pine, F., 1996. Magyar Women: Hungarian Women’s Lives 1960s-1990s.
  • Reading, A., 1992. Polish women, solidarity and feminism. Springer.
  • Weeks, J., 2017. Sex, politics and society: The regulation of sexuality since 1800. Routledge.
  • Welch, A., Helme, S. and Lamb, S., 2007. Rurality and inequality in education. In International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (pp. 602-624). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Women’s History Milestones: A Timeline. https://www.history.com/topics/womens-history/womens-history-us-timeline
  • Women Footprint in History.  https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/timeline/womensfootprintinhistory/en/index.html
  • Women of the world unite. https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/timeline/womenunite/en/index.html#/

II week

  • Bailey, A. H., LaFrance, M. and Dovidio, J. F. (2019) ‘Is Man the Measure of All Things? A Social Cognitive Account of Androcentrism’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23(4), pp. 307–331. doi: 10.1177/1088868318782848.
  • Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities. (2nd ed.). Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press
  • Connell, R.W. (2000). The Men and the Boys. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press
  • Deegan, Mary Jo (ed). Harriet Martineau: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives. Women and Sociological Theory vol 3. Routledge, 2003.
  • Eesti Naisühenduste Ümarlaua Sihtasutus. “Soostereotüübid varjavad individuaalsuse ja piiravad valikuvõimalusi”. 2012
  • HARIDUS JA SUGU. (n.d.). Haridus ja Sugu. Eesti Naisühenduste Ümarlaud. http://www.haridusjasugu.ee/. Accessed 20 August 2021
  • Holmwood, J. (1996), Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory, London: Longman. Holmwood, J. and O’Malley, M. (2003), ‘Evolutionary and Functionalist Historical Sociology’, in G. Delanty and E.F. Isin (eds)
  • Mis on diskrimineerimine? (n.d.). Võrdsete võimaluste volinik. https://volinik.ee/mis-on-diskrimineerimine/
  • Terav, Kairi. “Maskuliinsusest 19. ja 20. sajandi vahetuse Eesti realistikus kirjanduses Juhan Liivi, Eduard Vilde ja Ernst Peterson-Särgava looming näitel”. Magistritöö, Tartu Ülikool.
  • Veske, Christian. “Mehelikkuse soorituse paine”. Müürileht, 2017. Mehelikkuse soorituse paine | Müürileht (muurileht.ee)
  • Võrdsete võimaluste volinik | Mis on diskrimineerimine? – Võrdsete võimaluste volinik

III week

IV week

V week