{"id":7,"date":"2024-04-04T04:32:42","date_gmt":"2024-04-04T01:32:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/paradigmade-paljusus\/"},"modified":"2024-04-04T04:33:12","modified_gmt":"2024-04-04T01:33:12","slug":"paradigmade-paljusus","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/paradigmade-paljusus\/","title":{"rendered":"Paradigmade paljusus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Paradigmade paljusus<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Eelpool esitasime kaks peamist paradigma, kuid need ei ole ainukesed. N\u00e4iteks Della Porta ja Keating (2008) toovad esile neli paradigma, lisaks positivismile ja interpretivismile veel postpositivismi ja humanismi. Blaikie (2015) r\u00e4\u00e4gib samuti neljast klassikalisest paradigmast, kuid positivismi ja interpretivismi k\u00f5rval kasutab ta termineid kriitiline ratsionalism ja klassikaline hermeneutika ning eristab veel kuut kaasaegset paradigma: kriitiline teooria, etnometodoloogia, sotsiaalne realism, kaasaegne hermeneutika, strukturatsiooni teooria ja feminism. Guba ja Lincoln (1998) eristavad positivismi, postpositivismi, kriitilist teooriat ja konstruktsionismi. Samuti on erinevates sotsiaalteaduste distsipliinides nii-\u00f6elda omad lemmikud ja paradigmade jaotused. Seega on siinkohal oluline r\u00f5hutada, et paradigmade puhul v\u00f5ib olla mitmeid erinevaid liigendusi ja nimetusi, samuti vastanduvaid seisukohti kas n\u00e4iteks feminism on eraldiseisev paradigma v\u00f5i mitte. Vaadates Blaikie (2015) poolt esile toodud kuut kaasaegset paradigma, siis v\u00f5ib \u00f6elda, et pigem on toimunud liikumine interpretivistliku maailma vaate poole ning j\u00e4rjest enam toimub kaugenemine positivismist. Paradigmade paljusus on aga selge viide sellele, et sotsiaalteadustes ei toimu enam nii suurt paradigmade vahelist vastandumist.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Paradigmade paljusus Eelpool esitasime kaks peamist paradigma, kuid need ei ole ainukesed. N\u00e4iteks Della Porta ja Keating (2008) toovad esile neli paradigma, lisaks positivismile ja interpretivismile veel postpositivismi ja humanismi. Blaikie (2015) r\u00e4\u00e4gib samuti neljast klassikalisest paradigmast, kuid positivismi ja &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-7","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":265,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7\/revisions\/265"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/teadustoo_alused\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}