{"id":43,"date":"2024-04-03T23:09:24","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T20:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/11-comparison-approaches-selecting-most-suitable-approach-given-situation\/"},"modified":"2025-05-19T07:29:55","modified_gmt":"2025-05-19T04:29:55","slug":"11-comparison-approaches-selecting-most-suitable-approach-given-situation","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/11-comparison-approaches-selecting-most-suitable-approach-given-situation\/","title":{"rendered":"11. Comparison of the approaches"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Brief summary:<\/strong> This section summarized the main properties of the uncertainty estimation approaches, their advantages and drawbacks.<\/p>\n<p>Whenever possible, one of the so-called single-lab approaches should be used. The interlaboratory approaches are only suitable for getting very crude uncertainty estimates. We recommend using them only in case when the laboratory actually does not have the measurement in place yet and wants to know, approximately what uncertainty can be obtained.<\/p>\n<p>If the laboratory has competence and time to carry out investigations of the analytical procedures then the modeling approach is often suitable. If the laboratory has limited time and\/or expertise, but has validation and quality control data then the single-lab validation approach is the most suitable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><\/p><div class=\"ratio ratio-16x9 mb-3\"><div class=\"video-placeholder-wrapper video-placeholder-wrapper--16x9\">\n\t\t\t    <div class=\"video-placeholder d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center\">\n\t\t\t        <div class=\"overlay text-white p-2 w-100 text-center d-block justify-content-center align-items-center\">\n\t\t\t            <div>To view third-party content, please accept cookies.<\/div>\n\t\t\t            <button class=\"btn btn-secondary btn-sm mt-1 consent-change\">Change consent<\/button>\n\t\t\t        <\/div>\n\t\t\t    <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h4 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Comparison of measurement uncertainty estimation approaches<\/strong><br>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.uttv.ee\/naita?id=17917\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.uttv.ee\/naita?id=17917<\/a><\/h4>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TlpJ1c-9Rx8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TlpJ1c-9Rx8<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Table 11.1 summarizes the pros and cons of the approaches. See also Table 8.1 in <a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/8-overview-approaches-estimating-measurement-uncertainty\" data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/8-overview-approaches-estimating-measurement-uncertainty\">section 8<\/a> for some key differences.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Table 11.1. Comparison of the measurement uncertainty estimation approaches.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"640\" height=\"405\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-307\" style=\"margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;\" title=\"11_tabel.png\" src=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/11_tabel.png\" alt=\"11_tabel.png\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/11_tabel.png 640w, https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/11_tabel-300x190.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/self-test-11\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-60\" title=\"selftest.png\" src=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/18\/selftest.png\" alt=\"selftest.png\" width=\"104\" height=\"41\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brief summary: This section summarized the main properties of the uncertainty estimation approaches, their advantages and drawbacks. Whenever possible, one of the so-called single-lab approaches should be used. The interlaboratory approaches are only suitable for getting very crude uncertainty estimates. &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-43","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/43","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/43\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":881,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/43\/revisions\/881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/measurement\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}