{"id":28,"date":"2024-04-04T00:39:47","date_gmt":"2024-04-03T21:39:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/25-identity-confirmation-retention-time\/"},"modified":"2024-11-26T16:55:39","modified_gmt":"2024-11-26T14:55:39","slug":"25-identity-confirmation-retention-time","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/25-identity-confirmation-retention-time\/","title":{"rendered":"2.5. Identity confirmation: retention time"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Retention time and peak shape of an analyte in a standard solution and in a sample must match (within some tolerance limit, see below). If they do, then the\u00a0analyte may be present in the sample, but additional confirmation is still required. On the other hand, if the retention time or the peak shape differ, then the peak under question cannot be due to the analyte (assuming properly functioning LC system).<\/p>\n<p>For a proper chromatographic separation from fast-eluting sample components (which are often abundant), the analyte\u2019s retention time should be at least twice the hold-up time (aka dead time) time of the chromatographic system. This means that the retention factor <em>k<\/em> (aka capacity factor, <em>k\u2019<\/em>) should be \u2265 1. This recommendation is general in chromatography and is specifically important in case of LC-MS, because the matrix effects (ionization suppression\/enhancement) are most probable close to a\u00a0dead time of the system (see sections <a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/53-qualitative-estimation-matrix-effect\">5.3<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/54-quantitative-estimation-matrix-effect-recovery-process-efficiency\">5.4<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>According to the SANTE (formerly known as SANCO)\u00a0 [ref 4] validation guideline and the European Commission Implementing Regulation 2021\/808 [ref 5], retention times of an analyte in a sample and in a standard solution must not differ more than by 0.1 min. This requirement is valid in the case of classical HPLC as well as UHPLC. Additionally, the European Commission Implementing Regulation 2021\/808 specifies a tolerance criterion for an analyte retention time relative to the standard substance retention time. The relative retention time of an analyte in a standard solution must correspond to that in a sample within tolerance of 1%.<\/p>\n<p>The shape of the chromatographic peak may also be used to evaluate identity of an analyte. If peaks in a standard solution and in a sample differ in shape, it may indicate that the compound detected in the sample is not the analyte or that some compound coelutes with an\u00a0analyte. It is possible that the\u00a0analyte peak is distorted in a\u00a0sample because of the\u00a0sample matrix. In order to avoid\u00a0this, matrix matched standard solutions or isotopically labelled internal standard (ILIS) should be used. ILIS, although expensive, are rather common in LC-MS analysis. If ILIS are used, then the peak shape of an\u00a0analyte and a respective ILIS shall match.<\/p>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><div class=\"ratio ratio-16x9 mb-3\"><div class=\"video-placeholder-wrapper video-placeholder-wrapper--16x9\">\n\t\t\t    <div class=\"video-placeholder d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center\">\n\t\t\t        <div class=\"overlay text-white p-2 w-100 text-center d-block justify-content-center align-items-center\">\n\t\t\t            <div>To view third-party content, please accept cookies.<\/div>\n\t\t\t            <button class=\"btn btn-secondary btn-sm mt-1 consent-change\">Change consent<\/button>\n\t\t\t        <\/div>\n\t\t\t    <\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/div>Identity confirmation: retention time\u00a0<br><a href=\"\/\/www.uttv.ee\/naita?id=23631\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.uttv.ee\/naita?id=23631<\/a><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LWAeC2Xr2f0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=LWAeC2Xr2f0<\/a><\/h5>\n<h5 style=\"text-align: center;\">\u00a0<\/h5>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group attached-files-group is-layout-constrained wp-block-group-is-layout-constrained\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-file\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/130\/2_5_identity_lc_2024.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2_5_identity_lc.pdf<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Retention time and peak shape of an analyte in a standard solution and in a sample must match (within some tolerance limit, see below). If they do, then the\u00a0analyte may be present in the sample, but additional confirmation is still &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-28","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1506,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/28\/revisions\/1506"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/lcms_method_validation\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}