Ersin Tatar: the incumbent<\/em><\/p>\n As the incumbent president, Ersin Tatar ran as independent (as TRNC law prohibits an incumbent from running in elections with a political party) without rejecting his ties to National Unity Party (UBP) on a platform that defended his record and vision: the TRNC as a sovereign, equal, and independent state. Since his first term began in 2020, Tatar had consistently rejected the decades-long federal negotiation model, claiming that \u201cthe federation is over.\u201d<\/a> In 2025, he maintained that the two-state policy was not merely an alternative, but the only viable solution after years of failed talks with the Greek Cypriot side. He warned that a return to the federal framework would demote the Turkish Cypriots to a minority.<\/a><\/p>\n Image: Ersin Tatar, the incumbent president (Source: K\u0131br\u0131s Postas\u0131<\/a>)<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Tatar\u2019s campaign speeches emphasized gratitude toward T\u00fcrkiye and President Erdo\u011fan and the importance of unwavering coordination with Ankara. He presented T\u00fcrkiye as the guarantor of security and prosperity, citing joint projects such as the water pipeline, energy interconnection plans, and tourism investments. Framing himself as the protector of national will, Tatar accused his opponents of offering unrealistic ideas that could weaken the TRNC\u2019s hard-won sovereignty. His message was clear: security, identity, and sovereignty were non-negotiable, and only a leadership fully aligned with T\u00fcrkiye could safeguard them.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Tufan Erh\u00fcrman: the federalist reformer<\/em><\/p>\n Tufan Erh\u00fcrman, leader of the Republican Turkish Party (CTP), entered the race as the main opposition figure promisingcompetent, transparent, and internationally credible governance. A constitutional lawyer and former prime minister, Erh\u00fcrman represented the social-democratic and pro-federation wing of Turkish Cypriot politics. At the heart of his campaign was a commitment to reviving peace negotiations under UN parameters for a bi-communal, bi-zonal federation\u2014 not as an act of na\u00efvet\u00e9, but as a pragmatic attempt to overcome the island\u2019s deepening isolation. Erh\u00fcrman argued that disengaging from the international community and anchoring all political legitimacy in Ankara had not improved Turkish Cypriots\u2019 lives; instead, it had left them economically strained and diplomatically cornered.<\/p>\n Image: Erh\u00fcrman and his wife (Source: BBC<\/a>)<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n His message focused on institutional reform, meritocracy, and the rule of law,<\/a> calling for a serious and well-functioning state. Unlike Tatar, Erh\u00fcrman avoided populist language. He underscored that relations with T\u00fcrkiye would remain essential, and that his mission<\/a> is to carry the relations between TRNC and T\u00fcrkiye and their peoples to new heights.His message, invoking planning, discipline, and stability, captured a quiet but strong technocratic appeal: the belief that governance grounded in competence could restore both internal trust and international legitimacy.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n As of 2025, Northern Cyprus faces deep economic fatigue. Inflation, currency instability tied to the Turkish lira, and pandemic-era aftershocks have eroded living standards. Public frustration over housing prices, corruption, and patronage politics runs high. While Tatar positioned T\u00fcrkiye as the lifeline through financial assistance, many voters grew uneasy about the price of dependency \u2014 the perception that external influence had begun to shape not only economic policy but also the island\u2019s political direction. This created fertile ground for Erh\u00fcrman\u2019s message: that Northern Cyprus needed to govern itself better before seeking to redefine its international status. His campaign tapped into a widespread yearning for stability, professionalism, and a reduction in everyday uncertainty.<\/p>\n Although TRNC was accepted into the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) as an observer, five years of Tatar\u2019s two-state diplomacy has not yielded international recognition, nor has it brought the TRNC closer to broader legitimacy. While some Turkish Cypriots sympathize with the sovereignty argument, others see the approach as symbolically strong but practically isolating. Since the collapse of the Crans-Montana talks in 2017, successive rounds of negotiations between the two communities have gone nowhere. The 2021 Geneva talks, where Tatar formally proposed a two-state model, ended without progress. Many citizens feel stuck between an unworkable federal process and an unrecognized independence push, fueling both cynicism and the desire for a reset.<\/p>\n Tatar was not a particularly successful president in terms of unifying the nation towards a common goal, and critics argued that local autonomy was eroding, claiming direct interventions in electoral processes and administrative decisions. Furthermore, during Ersin Tatar\u2019s rule, scandals concerning money laundering issues<\/a> that flourished in the TRNC and corruption allegations connected to swiftly expanding construction projects cast a shadow over Tatar\u2019s run for this second term.<\/p>\n Although to outside observers the involvement of Ankara in Turkish Cypriot politics might seem decisive, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s official position regarding TRNC presidents have always been supportive. Sometimes the debate might intensify, a good example of this was the back-and-forth between now ex-president Mustafa Ak\u0131nc\u0131 and Turkish President Erdo\u011fan. In the 2020 elections and during Tatar\u2019s term, T\u00fcrkiye openly supported Tatar. However, interpreting this as a political stance against federationists would be a critical oversight as T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s change of stance regarding the solution to the frozen conflict has more to do with its disillusionment with the EU following the premature acceptance of Cyprus into the EU without the Turkish Cypriots, the stagnation of accession talks, and the East Mediterranean tensions, and less with Turkish Cypriots themselves.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The 2025 campaign unfolded in a polarized media environment. Pro-government outlets largely echoed Ankara\u2019s positions, often framing Ersin Tatar as the realist leader defending sovereignty, while casting Tufan Erh\u00fcrman as overly idealistic or even na\u00efve. Newspapers and TV commentators supportive of Tatar emphasized continuity, security, and gratitude toward T\u00fcrkiye, using emotionally charged narratives tied to national pride. Erh\u00fcrman, on the other hand, was often depicted as too intellectual and insufficiently assertive toward the Greek Cypriot side. He was also portrayed as a candidate who would drive TRNC further away from T\u00fcrkiye, claiming that his ultimate aim was to cut ties with the de facto states patron.<\/p>\n Opposition-leaning outlets tried to counter this narrative by highlighting Erh\u00fcrman\u2019s competence and integrity, portraying him as the candidate of seriousness and reform. His social media campaign, personal, disciplined, and policy-driven, resonated with younger, urban voters who felt alienated from traditional patronage politics. Erh\u00fcrman himself time and again emphasized the indispensability of T\u00fcrkiye and that foreign policy will be conducted<\/a> in close consultation with T\u00fcrkiye.<\/p>\n Despite the uneven media landscape, Erh\u00fcrman managed to build a coalition of moderate voters tired of polarization. His composure and refusal to engage in inflammatory rhetoric contrasted sharply with Tatar\u2019s populist tone. In the end, this difference in style helped redefine what leadership could look like in Northern Cyprus, less ideological, more administrative which in itself also contrasts with the traditional role of the Turkish Cypriot president of mostly conducting inter-communal talks for a solution to the problems of the island.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The elections resulted in a first round decisive victory<\/a> for Tufan Erh\u00fcrman, securing approximately 62.7% of the vote while Ersin Tatar received around 35.8%. While the turnout of 2025 (64.87%) did not stray too far from the rate of 2020 (58.31% for the first-round and 67.29% in the second), the landslide victory of President Erh\u00fcrman contrasted starkly with the victory of Ersin Tatar in 2020 who received 51.69% of the votes in a close contest with Mustafa Ak\u0131nc\u0131.<\/p>\n Erh\u00fcrman\u2019s victory in the elections can be attributed to a combination of strategic moderation, fatigue with a lack of forward progress in any type of solution to TRNC\u2019s isolation, deep economic issues resulting in brain drain, and his ability to reframe the question of sovereignty in pragmatic rather than ideological terms. By emphasizing governance, economic stability, and respect for democratic institutions rather than maximalist positions on the Cyprus issue, Erh\u00fcrman appealed to both disillusioned centrist voters and segments of the traditional right concerned about external dependency. His campaign managed to project calm competence against years of political polarization, making his win appear less a radical shift than a return to institutional normalcy.<\/p>\n Image: President Erh\u00fcrman celebrating victory (Source: Medyascope<\/a>)<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Turkish President Erdo\u011fan immediately congratulated President Erh\u00fcrman, and stated that<\/a> \u201cas T\u00fcrkiye, we will continue to defend the sovereignty rights and interests of TRNC on all kinds of platforms together with our Turkish Cypriot brothers,\u201d signaling that the outcome of the election will not pose a problem from a Turkish perspective despite some media outlets claiming otherwise. On one hand, the victory of President Erh\u00fcrman exhilarated the reunificationists. On the other, the narrative that Erh\u00fcrman sought to sever ties with T\u00fcrkiye gained traction on the two-state policy supporters\u2019 side. An interview<\/a> conducted by Sabahattin \u0130smail, a nationalist and a prominent Turkish Cypriot journalist who once served as an advisor to President Denkta\u015f, with Tufan Erh\u00fcrman before the elections took place surfaced, resulting in lowered anxieties of Turkish Cypriot nationalists. According to the interview, President Erh\u00fcrman has a set of principles that the Greek Cypriot side must agree to unconditionally for talks to resume:<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Domestically, Erh\u00fcrman raised the expectations but the task ahead is not a small one. He now needs to rebuild trust with T\u00fcrkiye while asserting domestic decision-making, revive negotiations without appearing submissive to Greek Cypriot or international pressure and restore institutions, tackle corruption and stabilize the economy under inflationary stress. Early signs suggest Erh\u00fcrman will focus first on domestic governance reforms, improving transparency, reducing partisanship in appointments, and strengthening public institutions, before pushing for major diplomatic moves. The approach reflects his belief that credibility abroad begins with credibility at home.<\/p>\n For Ersin Tatar and his allies, the election result represents a setback but not necessarily an erasure. His party UBP still holds a majority in the parliament with a prime minister from UBP. His term reshaped Turkish Cypriot political identity, normalizing discourse around sovereignty and recognition. Even in defeat, that narrative retains a substantial following, especially among nationalist and conservative voters who distrust renewed talks. Thus, Erh\u00fcrman\u2019s administration inherits not only a divided economy but a divided political imagination \u2014 between those who seek integration and those who fear dilution of identity.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Tufan Erh\u00fcrman\u2019s victory has been hailed as a turn toward moderation and institutional seriousness. Yet it would be premature to declare a new era. The constraints that shaped his predecessors remain: limited international recognition, military and financial dependence on T\u00fcrkiye, and an entrenched geopolitical deadlock. It is obvious that the rhetoric around President Erh\u00fcrman being almost \u201canti-T\u00fcrkiye\u201d was used to delegitimize his candidacy in the run to the presidency. However, after finding out what his principles are for the resumption of talks, a change in the status quo seems highly unlikely.<\/p>\n First of all, both President Erh\u00fcrman and T\u00fcrkiye realize that without T\u00fcrkiye\u2019s patronage there is no leverage TRNC holds. Second, the far-right nationalist National People\u2019s Front (ELAM) is increasing its foothold in Greek Cypriot politics. According to PolitPro<\/a>, the current election trend shows that ELAM increased its votes from 6.8% to 15.9% since the last elections which further complicates renewed talks. Third, although the Greek Cypriot side wants to meet with Erh\u00fcrman as soon as possible, and his election received commendations from the EU, it does not take an expert to assess that his set conditions will not be accepted by the Greek Cypriots.<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/398\/trnc2810251-e1761637894756.jpg\")
<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/398\/trnc28102512-e1761637924272.png\")
<\/p>\nSituation in Northern Cyprus leading to the elections<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Portrayal of Erh\u00fcrman by the media<\/strong><\/h2>\n
After the elections<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/398\/trnc28102513-e1761638155210.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n
What comes next?<\/strong><\/h2>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/398\/trnc28102514-e1761638181511.jpg\")
<\/p>\n