{"id":464,"date":"2024-04-29T01:06:32","date_gmt":"2024-04-28T22:06:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/?page_id=464"},"modified":"2024-05-06T15:23:30","modified_gmt":"2024-05-06T12:23:30","slug":"symposium-b5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/symposium-b5\/","title":{"rendered":"Symposium B.5: Verbalization of motion events in Uralic"},"content":{"rendered":"<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\">\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-extra-large-font-size\">Organizers: Jeremy Bradley (University of Vienna), Nikolett F. Guly\u00e1s (E\u00f6tv\u00f6s Lor\u00e1nd University), Johannes Hirvonen (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)<\/p>\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/626\/S_B5_Motion_events.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The core principle of lexical typology, that there is cross-linguistic variation in the structuring of semantic spaces, is highly salient when it comes to the verbalization of motion events. The division of labor between different forms habitually challenges language learners, translators, and authors of reference materials. This symposium is centered around approaches to delimit variation and alternation found in, and between, Uralic languages.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">One such approach is Leonard Talmy\u2019s cognitive-based typology of motion events (<strong>Talmy 1985, 2007<\/strong>). It introduces an atomistic view at the verbalization of motion events, where different semantic elements such as <em>Manner <\/em>(e.g., \ud83c\udfca, \u2708\ufe0f) and <em>Path<\/em> (e.g., \u2b06\ufe0f, \u2b07\ufe0f) are identified and their structuring is analyzed. He distinguishes between satellite-framed structures in which the (generally) finite verb marks the Manner and a so-called satellite, \u201ca bound af\ufb01x or a free word [\u2026]: English verb particles, German separable and inseparable verb pre\ufb01xes, Latin or Russian verb pre\ufb01xes, [\u2026]\u201d (<strong>Talmy 2007: 139<\/strong>), marks the Path, as exemplified by English in Figure 1.<\/p>\n<table class=\"table table-hover\" width=\"608\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p>MOTION, MANNER<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>PATH<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p>SOURCE\/GOAL<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p>VERB<sub>finite<\/sub><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>SATELLITE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p>N+(adposition, case)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p><em>go, run<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p><em>out<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p><em>of the house<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"201\">\n<p><em>go, run<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p><em>in<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"207\">\n<p><em>to the house<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Figure 1: Satellite-framed motion events in English (<strong>Slobin 2000: 109<\/strong>)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Meanwhile in verb-framed structures (<strong>Talmy 2007: 138<\/strong>), the (generally) finite verb marks the Path, while the Manner can optionally be indicated by a non-finite verbal form, as illustrated by Spanish in Figure 2.<\/p>\n<table class=\"table table-hover\" width=\"608\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>MOTION, PATH<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p>SOURCE\/GOAL<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p>MANNER<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>VERB<sub>finite<\/sub><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p>N+(adposition, case)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p>VERB<sub>nonfinite<\/sub><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p>\u2193<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p><em>salir<\/em> \u2018exit\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p><em>de la casa<\/em> \u2018of the house\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p><em>corriendo<\/em> \u2018running\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"200\">\n<p><em>entrar<\/em> \u2018enter\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"205\">\n<p><em>en la casa<\/em> \u2018in the house\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"203\">\n<p><em>corriendo<\/em> \u2018running\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Figure 2: Verb-framed motion events in Spanish (<strong>Slobin 2000: 109<\/strong>)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This typology has been at the core of an ample body of research into the verbalization of motion events in the languages of the world, with empirical research (especially using the textless picture book <em>Frog, Where Are You?<\/em> by Mercer Mayer, <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/BwDc3aOb-E0\">youtu.be\/BwDc3aOb-E0<\/a>) having been carried out to delimit the coexistence of and division of labor between these strategies in the languages of the world. The view of Uralic in general linguistic and typological literature has, however, remained rather shallow: Finno-Ugric [sic] languages are described as satellite-framed in the literature (e.g., <strong>Kohl-Dietrich 2019: 85<\/strong>, <strong>Asbury et al. 2008: 21<\/strong>; <strong>Filipovi\u0107 2007: 19<\/strong>; <strong>Talmy 2007: 72<\/strong>; <strong>Slobin 2006<\/strong>, <strong>Slobin 2000: 113<\/strong>), with a dearth of empirical evidence for this claim at the end of the citation chain. While satellite-framed structures indeed dominate in Uralic languages writ large, verb-framed structures have been documented especially, but not exclusively, in Uralic languages that have been subject to contact influence from (strongly verb-framing) Turkic languages: Mari, Udmurt, Erzya, Kamas, Selkup, but also Finnic (cf. <strong>Bradley 2016<\/strong>). In Mari (see Example 1), verb-framed structures seem to strongly dominate.<\/p>\n<p>(1)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Mari<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>va\u015ba\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 pu\u0161e\u014bge\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 g\u0259\u0311\u010d\u0301\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 t\u00f6r\u0161t-en\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u03b2ol-en<br><\/em>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Vasya\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 tree\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 out.of\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 jump-cvb\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 descend-pst2.3sg<br>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u2018Vasya jumped down (lit. jumping descended) from the tree.\u2019 (elicited)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Excessively simplistic abstractions about Uralic\/Finno-Ugric are a product of lacking accessible typological data: surveys exist on motion events in individual Uralic languages (e.g. <strong>Pajusalu et al. 2013<\/strong> for Estonian, <strong>Kajita 2021<\/strong> for the role of derivation in the verbalization of motion events in Finnish) and comparative studies of a limited scope have been carried out for a few Uralic languages (for example <strong>S\u00f6der 2001 <\/strong>for Hungarian, Northern Khanty, Northern Saami; <strong>Lander et al. 2013<\/strong> for verbs of aquamotion in Finnish, Komi-Zyrian, Nganasan, Selkup, and Udmurt, and numerous non-Uralic languages), but there has to date been no systematic contrastive review of this subject matter in the language family as a whole. This workshop aims to be a starting point for just this.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We invite contributions that either present empirical, quantitative data (corpus-based or elicitation-based) on the verbalization of motion events in Uralic languages, or in specific Uralic languages. Contributions can adhere to any theoretical approach. We also welcome contributions that dive into points of investigation regarding the verbalization of motion not detailed here, be it analyses of this semantic domain in an individual language through the lens of lexical typology or a contact-linguistic\/areal view on the distribution of strategies across different languages\/varieties. Contributions dealing with the connection between verbalization of motion events and aspect marking with a special attention to grammaticalization and\/or methodological issues are especially welcome.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A long-term goal is the compilation of an edited volume containing an expansive typological survey of the verbalization of motion events in Uralic languages, as well as any individual case studies that arise through the symposium.<\/p>\n<p><strong>References:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Asbury, Anna &amp; Berit Gehrke &amp; Henk van Riemsdijk &amp; Joost Zwarts 2008: Introduction: Syntax and semantics of spatial P. \u2013 Anna Asbury &amp; Jakub Dotla\u010dil &amp; Berit Gehrke &amp; Rick Nouwen (eds): <em>Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P.<\/em> Linguistics Today 120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 1\u201332. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/la.120.01asb\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/la.120.01asb<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Bradley, Jeremy 2016: Verb-Framed Motion Events in Uralic (with special attention to Mari). <em>Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen<\/em> 63. 126\u2013152. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33339\/fuf.86122\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.33339\/fuf.86122<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Filipovi\u0107, Luna 2007: <em>Talking about Motion \u2013 A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns<\/em>. Studies in Language Companion Series 91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ISBN 978-9-0272-3101-7.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kajita, Hirono 2021: <em>Suomen verbinjohtimet kognitiivisen semantiikan mukaisina satelliitteina<\/em>. MA thesis, University of Turku. <a href=\"https:\/\/urn.fi\/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021060434156\">https:\/\/urn.fi\/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021060434156<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Kohl-Dietrich, Dorothee 2019: <em>Cognitive Linguistics in the English as a foreign language classroom \u2013 An empirical study on teaching phrasal verbs<\/em>. Sprach-Vermittlungen 21. M\u00fcnster: Waxman. ISBN 978-3-8309-3853-8.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Lander, Yury &amp; Timur Maisak &amp; Ekatarina Rakhilina 2013: Verbs of aquamotion \u2013 semantic domains and lexical systems. \u2013 Mila Vulchanova &amp; Emile van der Zee (eds): <em>Motion Encoding in Language and Space<\/em>. Explorations in Language and Space 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 67\u201383. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199661213.003.0004\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199661213.003.0004<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Pajusalu, Renate &amp; Neeme Kahusk &amp; Heili Orav &amp; Ann Veismann &amp; Kadri Vider &amp; Haldur \u00d5im 2013: The encoding of motion events in Estonian. \u2013 Mila Vulchanova &amp; Emile van der Zee (eds): <em>Motion Encoding in Language and Space<\/em>. Explorations in Language and Space 6. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 44\u201366. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199661213.003.0003\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199661213.003.0003<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Slobin, Dan I. 2000: Verbalized Events: A Dynamic Approach to Linguistic Relativity and Determinism. \u2013 Susanne Niemeier &amp; Ren\u00e9 Dirven (eds): <em>Evidence for Linguistic Relativity<\/em>. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Amsterdam. 107\u2013138. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/cilt.198.10slo\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/cilt.198.10slo<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2013 2006: What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. \u2013 Maya Hickmann &amp; St\u00e9phane Robert (eds): <em>Space in languages \u2013 Linguistic systems and cognitive categories<\/em>. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 59\u201381. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/tsl.66.05slo\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/tsl.66.05slo<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">S\u00f6der, Torbj\u00f6rn 2001: <em>\u201cWalk this way\u201d \u2013 verbs of motion in three Finno-Ugric languages<\/em>. Studia Uralica et Altaica Upsaliensia 33. Uppsala: Uppsala University. ISBN: 978-9-1554-4905-6.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Talmy, Leonard 1985: Lexicalization patterns \u2013 semantic structure in lexical form. \u2013 Timothy Shopen (ed.): <em>Language Typology and Syntactic Description III \u2013 Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon<\/em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 57\u2013149. ISBN: 978-0-5213-1899-0.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u2013 2007: Lexical typologies. \u2013 Timothy Shopen (ed.): <em>Language Typology and Syntactic Description III \u2013 Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon<\/em> (Second Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 66\u2013168. ISBN: 978-0-5113-5547-9.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Contact person: <\/strong>Jeremy Bradley <a href=\"mailto:jeremy.moss.bradley@univie.ac.at\">jeremy.moss.bradley@univie.ac.at<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Organizers: Jeremy Bradley (University of Vienna), Nikolett F. Guly\u00e1s (E\u00f6tv\u00f6s Lor\u00e1nd University), Johannes Hirvonen (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich) Download PDF The core principle of lexical typology, that there is cross-linguistic variation in the structuring of semantic spaces, is highly &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":306,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-464","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/306"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=464"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":534,"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/464\/revisions\/534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sisu.ut.ee\/cifu14\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}